Literature Review for Uber Unfair Dismissal Case- myassignmenthelp

Question: Discuss about theLiterature Review for Uber Unfair Dismissal Case. Answer: Introduction Human resource is the biggest asset for any organization which could help the organization to attain its goals and the objectives. In this assessment, business article on the Uber Companys unfair dismissal cases will be discussed. Uber is a well-known multinational service providing company involved in providing cab services to its users. Under this article, it was observed that Uber was not treating its cabdrivers in fair manner. The main concern was Uber was treating its drivers as their employees and it was leading to the exploitation of the drivers interest in the company. In order to determine various objectives regarding this article, Significance, objectives, issues, etc. will be identified in order to gain appropriate knowledge in relevance with the business article. Significance of Study According to Thijssens, Bollen, Hassink (2015), business article was published on the treatment done by the Uber Company with its employees. They were not treating their cab drivers as their permanent employees and it was leading to various issues. In this literature review, various aspects of this case will be discussed. As per the AFR report, Uber Company was exploiting its employees (driver) rights. The benefits which should an employee should get from its employer were not given to the drivers due to this unfair treatment. With regards to this, Rideshare Drivers Association of Australia defended the drivers of Uber and they filed a case against the company so that Uber Companys drivers could get adequate benefits. With practising this functionality, Uber was exploiting the job security of the drivers. The case filed by the Association was submitted to the Fair Work Commission with regards to breaching of contracts which were made by the company with the drivers. The contracts te rms and conditions clearly describes that drivers are performing functionalities for company as per the requirement. In this scenario, companys liability towards the drivers was nil if they wants to discontinue with the driver. Issues With the effect of this business article, Collings (2014), reviewed the case and argued that this was leading to enhancement of the job security with the employees (drivers) linked with the company. As per the Human Resource policies published by the Australian government, organization needs to work for employees interest which is also a corporate social responsibility from the perceptive of the organization. The major issue which was employees were facing with the organizations act was leading to the job insecurity to the drivers. As per the rules and the regulations, employees have the right to know regarding the amendments made in the policies of the company. Irrelevance to this fact, Uber Company has overruled this policy and they have developed contracts under which organization does not need to provide any type of prior notice before retrenchment of drivers or breaching of contract. Apart from this, it was also leading to the breaching of the corporate social responsibility in which organization needs to develop and maintain certain criteria for securing its stakeholders interest. Uber was practising unethical activities which were leading to the development of negative image in the consumers as well as in employees mind-sets. Reviewing the functionalities of the organization, Uber was not following any of the ethical policy in their working procedure. In the given scenario, drivers faces any situation while serving for company; they will not be liable to provide any kind of services or help. This was not only affecting the interest of the employees, it was leading to the various issues such as organizations image was declining in the global market. Objective Objective of this research is to identify the motive of Uber Company in relevance with the unfair dismissal of its employees. Employees are known as the workforce of the organization and they are the major sources through which organization could reach its desired objectives and the goals. But Uber Company is following unfair practices under which they have made new contracts for the drivers with unethical clauses. These clauses define that organization could break the contract when they feel and no employee can take any kind of legal action against the organizational decision. The amendments done by the organizational management was without informing the drivers. It was leading to the job insecurity for the drivers. As per Cook (2016), every company needs to follow and adopt HR policies and with regards to those policies, organization needs to develop certain strategies through which organization could secure its employees and other stakeholders interest. But as per the article publ ished, Uber was not fulfilling these requirements which were enhancing the job security as well as it was leading to the breaching of CSR (Corporate Social Responsibility). Apart from identifying the motive behind the companys amendments in the policies, it was also observed that the organization was performing these activities for securing themselves from any kind of liability towards its drivers. It was also leading to the breaching of the HR policies and it was not leading to dissatisfaction amongst the employees (drivers). The unethical behaviour done by the Uber Company was analysed from the business article and through the same article, various other unethical activities practiced by the organization were also gets analysed. Sources of Information and research design The strategy used for conducting above research is qualitative research design. For the better understanding and the evaluation, secondary sources of the information were used as Secondary stakeholder influence on CSR disclosure: An application of stakeholder salience theory. Identify Hypothesis and Conclusion In order to determine the hypothesis for above case, from the perception of the Uber Company, it can be evaluated that the overall objective of the company is to gain maximum profits and the revenues while another hypothesis situation will be from the perception of the employees. It is said that, they should be treated with adequate benefits and rewards which should be provided to a permanent employee. From the above research, it can be concluded that organizational performance should met the objectives of the employees to attaining better growth and success. As Uber Company is not fulfilling the HR policies as well as the CSR requirements which were leading them towards the declining position in the global market. Bibliography Collings, D. G. (2014). Integrating global mobility and global talent management: Exploring the challenges and strategic opportunities. Journal of World Business, 49(2), 253-261 Cook, M. (2016). Personnel Selection: Adding Value Through People-a Changing Picture. John Wiley Sons. Thijssens, T., Bollen, L., Hassink, H. (2015). Secondary stakeholder influence on CSR disclosure: An application of stakeholder salience theory. Journal of Business Ethics, 132(4), 873-891.